Priority guideGear review9 min read

Salomon XT-Pathway Review: Original, 2 & GORE-TEX

Source-checked Salomon XT-Pathway review comparing the original, XT-Pathway 2 and GORE-TEX models for fit, weight, waterproofing and UK use.

At a glance

What to know

Topic
Gear review
Reading time
9 minutes
Last changed
Article length
2,051 words
Evidence
Manufacturer-spec research
Sources checked

Short verdict: the Salomon XT-Pathway family is better understood as trail-derived everyday footwear than as a current technical trail-running range. The original XT-Pathway established the formula; the current XT-Pathway 2 is the lighter, non-waterproof everyday option, while the XT-Pathway GORE-TEX adds a membrane and 40g to the listed weight for wetter conditions.

This is a researched comparison, not a wear test. Zone2 has not retained a verifiable test log, test size or photographs for the original article, so unsupported first-person mileage, grip, fit and durability claims have been removed. The original model is checked against an official archived Salomon product record; current XT-Pathway 2 and GORE-TEX details are checked against exact Salomon UK listings.

Zone2 verdict

Choose the XT-Pathway 2 for: everyday wear, travel, commuting and maintained paths when you want the XT look, Quicklace and a rugged outsole without a waterproof membrane.

Choose the XT-Pathway GORE-TEX for: colder, wetter everyday use when membrane protection matters more than minimum weight or maximum ventilation.

Choose neither as your primary shoe for: regular road mileage, technical trail training, fell racing or long-distance hiking. Salomon currently categorises both as unisex sneakers, not as performance running or hiking shoes.

Main trade-off: you get trail-derived structure, protection and outsole geometry in a street-focused package. That can make sense for mixed everyday use, but it does not prove running comfort, wet-rock grip or all-day hiking performance.

Original, XT-Pathway 2 or GORE-TEX?

ModelWhat Salomon listsBest reason to choose itMain limitation
Original XT-PathwayOlder Sportstyle shoe; article ref. L47443900 in the surviving official recordYou already own it or find old stock in the right size and conditionDiscontinued reference; do not transfer current-model dimensions or pricing to it
XT-Pathway 2Current unisex sneaker; 283g, 11mm drop, no membrane listedThe lighter current option for everyday useNot verified as waterproof and not positioned as a performance trail shoe
XT-Pathway GORE-TEXCurrent unisex sneaker; 323g, 11mm drop, GORE-TEX membraneWet-weather coverage in the XT-Pathway shape40g heavier by the listed figures and likely warmer than the open-mesh version

The simple buying rule is to start with weather. If you do not need a membrane, the XT-Pathway 2 is lighter and avoids paying for waterproof construction. If repeated rain and wet ground are central to the use case, the GORE-TEX version is the more direct choice. If you need a running shoe rather than a sneaker, change category instead of choosing between these two.

Verified specifications

These figures were checked on 17 July 2026. Salomon does not state the sample size for the listed weights, and sizes will vary.

SpecificationOriginal XT-PathwayXT-Pathway 2XT-Pathway GORE-TEX
Current categoryOlder Sportstyle shoeUnisex sneakerUnisex sneaker
Article reference checkedL47443900L47686800L47577500
Listed UK priceNot current£120£140
Listed weightNot published in the surviving source checked283g per unit323g per unit
Heel-to-toe dropNot published in the surviving source checked11mm11mm
MembraneNone listedNone listedGORE-TEX
FasteningQuicklace with lace pocketQuicklace with lace pocketCoated Quicklace with lace pocket
Foot holdEmbossed SensiFitSensiFitSensiFit
ChassisAgile Chassis System with EnergyCellAgile Chassis System with EnergyCellAgile Chassis System with EnergyCell
OutsoleMud Contagrip with chevron lugsMud Contagrip with chevron lugsMud Contagrip with chevron lugs
Upper protectionAnti-debris mesh, toe cap and mudguardAnti-debris mesh, toe cap and mudguardClosed anti-debris mesh, toe cap and mudguard
SocklinerDie-cut OrthoLiteDie-cut OrthoLiteDie-cut OrthoLite

Salomon’s current UK XT-Pathway 2 listing provides the 283g weight, 11mm drop and construction. The current UK XT-Pathway GORE-TEX listing provides the 323g weight, 11mm drop and membrane specification. An official Salomon record for the original XT-Pathway confirms its product reference and core construction without supplying a current UK price, weight or drop.

What changed from the original to XT-Pathway 2?

The broad formula stayed consistent: Quicklace, SensiFit, an Agile Chassis System, EnergyCell, OrthoLite, anti-debris mesh, a protective toe area and Mud Contagrip with chevron lugs. The family resemblance is therefore more than visual.

The current XT-Pathway 2 listing calls out a streamlined mix of resistant TPU film and mesh and publishes an 11mm drop and 283g weight. Salomon also explicitly frames it as a lightweight, durable sneaker built for the everyday journey. That current positioning corrects the old Zone2 page, which treated the XT-Pathway primarily as a trail-running shoe and invented comfortable distance limits.

Do not assume an original pair has the exact geometry, mass or materials of the second version. Product names can persist while colourways, suppliers and construction details change. When buying old stock, use the label inside the shoe to identify the article reference and judge the actual condition of the foam, glue, upper and outsole.

Is the Salomon XT-Pathway a running shoe?

Not in Salomon’s current UK classification. The XT-Pathway 2 and XT-Pathway GORE-TEX are listed as unisex sneakers within the Sportstyle side of the range. Their chassis and outsole draw from Salomon’s trail heritage, but heritage does not make a current product a dedicated training shoe.

Some people can jog comfortably in everyday footwear. That is different from recommending it for regular training. Zone2 has no controlled comparison for ride, flex, impact comfort, heel hold or fatigue over a measured distance. The old claims that it was comfortable for eight to ten miles, suited canal-path runs and performed confidently on wet surfaces were not supported by a retained test record.

For routine road or trail mileage, use the Zone2 shoe finder and select a current performance model for your terrain, distance and fit needs. A running-specific shoe gives you clearer information about intended use and makes comparisons more meaningful.

Grip: what Mud Contagrip can and cannot tell you

All three references checked list Mud Contagrip and chevron lugs. Salomon describes this outsole as designed for loose, soft, rugged and uneven surfaces, using deep, sharp lugs and a compound focused on adhesion. Chevron geometry is intended to provide multi-directional grip on soft ground.

That specification supports describing the outsole as trail-derived. It does not support the old article’s claims of excellent traction on every terrain or no grip concerns on wet routes. Outsole performance changes with the rubber compound, lug wear, mud type, surface angle, contamination and temperature. Smooth wet paving, algae, ice and polished rock remain possible slip hazards.

For an everyday sneaker, the rugged outsole may be useful on gravel, park paths and loose verges. For technical running, a purpose-built model should be evaluated for the exact terrain. No product name or lug pattern can remove the need to adjust speed and foot placement to conditions.

Is the XT-Pathway waterproof?

The standard XT-Pathway 2 is not listed with a waterproof membrane. Tight anti-debris mesh can help keep grit out, but it should not be presented as waterproof. A small splash and sustained rain are different tests.

The XT-Pathway GORE-TEX is the waterproof member of this comparison. Salomon lists a GORE-TEX membrane, closed anti-debris mesh and coated Quicklace, and describes the membrane as PFC-free. Those are manufacturer specifications, not a Zone2 immersion or rain test.

A membrane cannot stop water entering over the collar, and waterproof footwear normally trades some ventilation and drying speed for weather protection. The GORE-TEX model’s 323g listed weight is 40g above the XT-Pathway 2 figure. Whether that compromise is worthwhile depends on how often your everyday routes are genuinely wet.

Fit, sizing and Quicklace

SensiFit is intended to cradle the foot between the midsole and lacing system, while Quicklace uses a single pull cord stored in a lace pocket. That combination makes adjustment quick and reduces loose lace ends. It does not establish that the shape will suit every foot.

Start with Salomon’s current size guide and try the shoes with the socks you expect to wear. Check that the toes can move without sliding on descents, the heel stays secure, and the lacing does not create pressure across the instep. If the shape feels too narrow, simply adding length can create heel movement without solving the underlying width mismatch.

GORE-TEX construction can feel different from open mesh even when the nominal size is the same. Anyone comparing the versions should try both rather than assuming the membrane option will wrap the foot identically.

Comfort, cushioning and weight

Salomon lists an EnergyCell midsole, Agile Chassis System, textile lining and die-cut OrthoLite sockliner. The company says the chassis works with the midsole for stability and dampening, while the sockliner contributes cushioning and comfort. Zone2 has not measured softness, energy return, flex or compression over time.

The XT-Pathway 2’s 283g figure is the more attractive starting point for travel and everyday wear. The GORE-TEX model’s additional 40g is modest in absolute terms but reflects its more protective build. Salomon does not name the reference size on the UK pages checked, so neither figure is a promise for every pair.

The 11mm drop describes the difference between heel and forefoot height; it does not establish total stack, stability, injury risk or comfort. The old page’s claims about a firm EVA ride, eight-to-ten-mile comfort and long-run cushioning limits have been removed because they were not tied to a documented test.

Walking, travel and light paths

Everyday walking is the most defensible use for this family because it matches Salomon’s current positioning. Protective upper elements, a structured chassis and trail-derived outsole can be useful for city breaks, commuting and routes that mix pavement with maintained paths.

For long days, fit matters more than the specification list. Try the shoe late in the day when feet may be larger, use the intended socks, and confirm that the Quicklace cord does not concentrate pressure. For travel, also consider how quickly the upper dries and whether the GORE-TEX model’s warmer construction suits the climate.

For remote hikes, mountain routes or heavy packs, select footwear for the consequences of a failure as well as comfort. The XT-Pathway is not currently presented as a hiking model, and this guide does not claim ankle support, rock protection or multi-day durability.

Price and availability in the UK

On 17 July 2026, Salomon UK listed the XT-Pathway 2 at £120 and the XT-Pathway GORE-TEX at £140. Prices, stock and colours can change. The original XT-Pathway is an older reference, so remaining pairs may come from resellers or clearance stock rather than Salomon’s current UK range.

Compare the exact article reference, return policy and condition—not only the model name. Old stock is not automatically poor value, but ageing foam, storage conditions and uncertain authenticity matter. Zone2 has no paid placement or affiliate link in this guide.

Who should buy which model?

  • Buy XT-Pathway 2: if you want the lighter current version for everyday wear and do not need a waterproof membrane.
  • Buy XT-Pathway GORE-TEX: if frequent rain justifies the extra cost, weight and likely warmth.
  • Consider original XT-Pathway old stock: only when the article reference, condition, authenticity, fit and price are all clear.
  • Choose a running shoe instead: if the main purpose is regular road, trail or long-distance training.
  • Choose a hiking shoe instead: if the main purpose is demanding, remote or load-bearing walking.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between XT-Pathway and XT-Pathway 2?

The second version keeps the same broad Quicklace, SensiFit, chassis and Mud Contagrip formula, while the current UK listing publishes a 283g weight, 11mm drop and everyday sneaker positioning. Do not assume every first-generation detail is identical.

Is Salomon XT-Pathway 2 waterproof?

No waterproof membrane is listed for the standard XT-Pathway 2. Choose the explicitly named XT-Pathway GORE-TEX when membrane protection is required.

How much does the XT-Pathway 2 weigh?

Salomon lists 283g per unit. The UK page does not state the reference size, so actual weight varies by size.

How much heavier is the GORE-TEX model?

The current figures are 323g for XT-Pathway GORE-TEX and 283g for XT-Pathway 2, a listed difference of 40g per shoe. Both figures lack a stated sample size.

Can you run trails in the XT-Pathway?

The outsole is trail-derived, but Salomon currently categorises the models as sneakers. Zone2 has not performance-tested them, so use a current trail-running shoe for regular training or technical terrain.

Does XT-Pathway use normal laces?

The original, XT-Pathway 2 and GORE-TEX references checked all use Quicklace with a lace pocket. The previous Zone2 article’s claim that the standard model used conventional laces was incorrect.

Sources and update status

Zone2 has not retained a verifiable wear-test log, test size or photographs for the original XT-Pathway article. This guide therefore removes unsupported first-person performance claims and compares the original model with the current XT-Pathway 2 and XT-Pathway GORE-TEX using exact official Salomon product records.

Meaningful update: Consolidated a weaker overlapping GORE-TEX review into the stronger search URL, corrected the fastening from standard laces to Quicklace, replaced unsupported trail-running and mileage conclusions with current Sportstyle positioning, and added a direct original-versus-2-versus-GORE-TEX decision guide.

Published 14 June 2024; last changed 17 July 2026. Send a correction.